A lot has changed during the evolution of the court system in the U. S. Through various reviews, the judiciary has been able to curb the frequent cases of defendants failing to adhere to the promise of appearing for trial after release. Modern Bail Bonds Grand Rapids system was initiated by Peter McDonough in the latter years of the nineteenth century.
In definition, a bail bond is a written promise by a defendant to face financial implications, should they fail to turn up for a trial on a preset date. Failure to adhere to the promise thereof, the defendant will have to pay a fixed sum of money that the judge sets. A financial organization, insurance agency or a renowned credit organization, through a bondsman, can provide a surety.
More often than not, the court is responsible for setting the bond value amount. The sum is not consistent to all cases, but it varies depending on the extent of damage done by the alleged criminal suspect. Through this system, the defendant enjoys a quick means to freedom as the case matures in judicial buildings. Some police precincts draw up the bond fee, albeit this happens sporadically.
Unfortunate enough, not all accused persons appearing before a judge have the financial capacity to cater for the amount set by the judge or magistrate. In such an event, the accused has the chance to visit a surety firm, bank or a credit organization for assistance with the amount. That is convenient, but not quite. Defendants usually give up their assets or valuables as collateral.
When one decides to consult a middleman, for instance a bondsman, they are usually asked to pay a commission. The sum is normally a percentage of the total amount set by the judge. A standard ten percent commission is attached to moneys exceeding one thousand dollars. If the alleged offender ultimately declines to show up, the company pays, and collects the security from the defendant.
During appeals, there are also bonds involved. These are also referred to as Supersedeas or Safety Net bonds, the sum paid to the higher court as a judgement is being awaited. When the losing counsel feels a pang of discontentment, the appellant provides a sum of cash as assurance of commitment to the judicial process. The judges may decide to set a new fee, abandoning the first one.
The appeals bond is not a matter of the lower courts at the state level alone. The practice is also seen at the federal level. The plaintiff, while filing the appeal, provides details of the previous hearing and the aspects in which they feel were impartially determined. If applying for a bond, the decision should be made soon after judgement.
Violation of the bond contract has implications. Despite the fact that the surety company will have to bear the risks of losing the amount by the court, the rogue defendant becomes the center of adhesive scrutiny, because it will issue a warrant of arrest. Further, the assets or securities will be confiscated by the surety firm.
In definition, a bail bond is a written promise by a defendant to face financial implications, should they fail to turn up for a trial on a preset date. Failure to adhere to the promise thereof, the defendant will have to pay a fixed sum of money that the judge sets. A financial organization, insurance agency or a renowned credit organization, through a bondsman, can provide a surety.
More often than not, the court is responsible for setting the bond value amount. The sum is not consistent to all cases, but it varies depending on the extent of damage done by the alleged criminal suspect. Through this system, the defendant enjoys a quick means to freedom as the case matures in judicial buildings. Some police precincts draw up the bond fee, albeit this happens sporadically.
Unfortunate enough, not all accused persons appearing before a judge have the financial capacity to cater for the amount set by the judge or magistrate. In such an event, the accused has the chance to visit a surety firm, bank or a credit organization for assistance with the amount. That is convenient, but not quite. Defendants usually give up their assets or valuables as collateral.
When one decides to consult a middleman, for instance a bondsman, they are usually asked to pay a commission. The sum is normally a percentage of the total amount set by the judge. A standard ten percent commission is attached to moneys exceeding one thousand dollars. If the alleged offender ultimately declines to show up, the company pays, and collects the security from the defendant.
During appeals, there are also bonds involved. These are also referred to as Supersedeas or Safety Net bonds, the sum paid to the higher court as a judgement is being awaited. When the losing counsel feels a pang of discontentment, the appellant provides a sum of cash as assurance of commitment to the judicial process. The judges may decide to set a new fee, abandoning the first one.
The appeals bond is not a matter of the lower courts at the state level alone. The practice is also seen at the federal level. The plaintiff, while filing the appeal, provides details of the previous hearing and the aspects in which they feel were impartially determined. If applying for a bond, the decision should be made soon after judgement.
Violation of the bond contract has implications. Despite the fact that the surety company will have to bear the risks of losing the amount by the court, the rogue defendant becomes the center of adhesive scrutiny, because it will issue a warrant of arrest. Further, the assets or securities will be confiscated by the surety firm.
About the Author:
If you are looking for the facts about bail bonds Grand Rapids residents can come to our web pages today. More details are available at http://bigbrotherbonds.com now.
